Case Study — Digital Solutions Website Optimization
WordPress Performance Engineering

Digital Solutions
Site Optimization

A live events staffing company’s WordPress site was bleeding performance — render-blocking resources, unoptimized assets, zero CDN. The goal: a surgically clean audit and implementation that pushed Lighthouse from 75 to a perfect 100, without touching the theme or breaking the build.

WordPress Core LiteSpeed Cache Core Web Vitals CDN Configuration Lighthouse Audit LOCALWP Hostinger Staging Environment Google PageSpeed Insights
Score Snapshot — Desktop
Performance
75 100
+25 pts
Accessibility
84 90
+6 pts
Best Practices
96 100
+4 pts
SEO
92 92
Maintained
Load Time — Before & After
First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1.6s → 0.4s
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2.7s → 0.6s
Total Blocking Time (TBT) ~200ms → 0ms

Bar width is proportional to time cost. Grey = before. Green = after.

Why the site was slow

  • Render-blocking JavaScript and CSS holding up the critical path
  • Large unoptimized hero images inflating the LCP metric
  • No CDN — assets serving from a single origin on every request
  • Unused CSS and JS being loaded on every page load
  • Lighthouse score of 75 signalling real user experience impact

Before touching anything

  • Ran a full Lighthouse audit — desktop and mobile — to baseline every metric
  • Used PageSpeed Insights to identify real-field data vs lab data gaps
  • Traced render-blocking resources in the waterfall to find the actual bottleneck
  • Profiled CSS coverage to quantify unused stylesheet weight
  • Identified LCP element and measured its delivery chain end-to-end
Optimization Strategy
01

LiteSpeed Cache — configured, not just installed

Most sites install LiteSpeed and leave defaults. I tuned cache TTLs, excluded dynamic pages, enabled object cache, and configured browser caching rules per asset type. Cache warming was also set up to avoid cold-start penalties after deploys.

02

Render-blocking JS deferred at the resource level

Identified every script holding up the parser. Non-critical JavaScript was deferred or loaded asynchronously. Scripts with DOM dependencies were moved to after DOMContentLoaded — no guesswork, traced through the waterfall.

03

CSS delivery optimised — critical path inlined

Above-the-fold CSS was inlined to eliminate a render-blocking stylesheet request. Unused CSS was identified via coverage tools and pruned. Non-critical styles were loaded asynchronously using media attribute swapping.

04

LiteSpeed CDN enabled for global asset delivery

Configured CDN rules to serve static assets from edge nodes, cutting origin round-trips. Image, font, and script delivery was routed through the CDN with appropriate cache headers set per content type.

05

LCP image optimised at the source

The hero image — the LCP element — was resized, re-encoded as WebP, and preloaded via <link rel=”preload”> in the document head. This alone dropped LCP from 2.7s to under 1s before further tuning.

06

Accessibility — heading structure and contrast fixes

Corrected the heading hierarchy (non-sequential h tags were breaking screen reader navigation) and fixed colour contrast issues flagged by Lighthouse. These changes pushed the accessibility score from 84 to 90 without any design changes.

What a perfect score actually means

A 100 Lighthouse score isn’t a trophy — it’s evidence of a site that loads fast enough to stop losing visitors before the page even renders. For a service business, every second of LCP is a potential enquiry that never happened.

  • LCP of 0.6s places the site firmly in Google’s “Good” threshold — directly tied to Core Web Vitals ranking signals
  • Zero Total Blocking Time means users can interact with the page the instant it loads, reducing bounce from frustration
  • CDN delivery reduces server load, meaning the same hosting plan handles more concurrent traffic without degradation
  • Improved accessibility score extends the site’s reach and contributes to SEO signals Google factors into rankings
  • Optimized asset delivery lowers bandwidth costs and reduces origin server requests long-term
Core Web Vitals — 2025 Thresholds
LCP
Largest Contentful Paint
Good: < 2.5s
Achieved: 0.6s ✓
INP
Interaction to Next Paint
Good: < 200ms
TBT: 0ms ✓
CLS
Cumulative Layout Shift
Good: < 0.1
Achieved: 0.004 ✓

Google requires 75% of page loads to meet “Good” thresholds for a site to pass Core Web Vitals assessment. This site passes all three.

Technical Skills Demonstrated
WordPress Performance Optimization LiteSpeed Cache Configuration Core Web Vitals Render-blocking Resource Reduction CSS Delivery Optimization JavaScript Deferral CDN Configuration Google Lighthouse PageSpeed Insights WebP Image Encoding Critical Path Analysis Accessibility Remediation